Template:Did you know nominations/Tunnels of Gibraltar

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Tunnels of Gibraltar

edit

Admiralty Tunnel

Moved to mainspace by Prioryman (talk). Self nominated at 09:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC).

Notification to reviewers
Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any conflict of interest or promotional concerns about the article under review. IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews. When you have completed a review, please update the respective table below to change the background color to green and note that the review has been completed.
First review completed
  • Looks fine as usual, aside from the hidden threat asserting that if readers don't come to Gibraltar they'll be "eliminated"...♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Second review completed
  • - Looks fine. I'll AGF about the offline sources. I'm going to say that putting the citation at the end of the quote is OK. King Jakob C2 23:10, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Article - moved to main space on 15 June, so new enough; 16,536 characters of readable prose, so long enough; neutral; no copy vios detected using earwig/duplication detector on the one online source; un-assessed so not a stub.
  • Hook - within length criteria at 195 characters; correctly formatted; correctly cited/supported by ref #19 in 'Design' section; and interesting.
  • QPQ done; image license is CC BY-SA 3.0, so not problem.
  • I see no promotional concerns, nor any COI issues in this well written, informative article.

The first paragraph under section 1939-45 needs a reference (unless I'm missing it somewhere). The hook is referenced at the end of the quotation but does it also need to be immediately beside the first sentence of the quote for the DYK rule? Sorry, I'm not sure if it's slightly different when it's a quote. SagaciousPhil - Chat 08:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I've added a reference for that 1st paragraph you mentioned. Prioryman (talk) 23:27, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Prioryman - it looks as King Jacob had already stepped in and approved it anyway above. SagaciousPhil - Chat 06:45, 27 June 2013 (UTC)