Template:Did you know nominations/Tubercuoolithus

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 10:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Tubercuoolithus

edit

Created by Ashorocetus (talk). Self-nominated at 01:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC).

I suggested the ALT3. The article is long enough, new enough, well cited, ... Snek01 (talk) 21:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your review. ALT3 I think is slightly misleading, since there are other fossil dinosaur eggs from the same site which would be the same age as Tubercuoolithus, but I'd be OK with it if that's not an issue and nobody objects. Ashorocetus (talk | contribs) 00:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • ALT0: verified.
  • ALT1: verified.
  • ALT2: verified according to images in the reference.
Everything OK. Good to go. I like the ALT0. Snek01 (talk) 14:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)