Template:Did you know nominations/Transformers: Fall of Cybertron
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:35, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Transformers: Fall of Cybertron edit
... that Transformers: Fall of Cybertron will have at least one Dinobot?
ALT1:... that the upcoming Transformers: Fall of Cybertron will not be based on a movie, unlike the disappointing 2010 video game, Transformers: Dark of the Moon?ALT2:... that the disappointing 2010 video game Transformers: Dark of the Moon was based on a movie while the upcoming Transformers: Fall of Cybertron will be an original game?- ALT3:... that the upcoming video game Transformers: Fall of Cybertron will not be based on a movie, unlike the 2010 title, Transformers: Dark of the Moon?
ALT4:... that High Moon Studios is developing an original Transformers game after having created a game based on the movie Transformers: Dark of the Moon?ALT5:... that the upcoming video game Transformers: Fall of Cybertron will show a darker side of the Transformers universe?- Reviewed: Norma Eberhardt
- Comment: Three different reliable publications called Dark of the Moon "disappointing" when thinking back to the game, and they were comparing it directly to the upcoming title.
Created/expanded by WikiEditor44 (talk). Nominated by Odie5533 (talk) at 03:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
The remark of "disappointing" is not neutral, and there's not enough room in a DYK to explain that. The fact that critics felt that way is irrelevant and biased in this case since we can't expand on it. --Teancum (talk) 03:44, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Is the original DYK acceptable? I added two more, perhaps they are better? Also, if we ignore the opinions of critics then articles would be unable to say that anything created was ever bad. --Odie5533 (talk) 04:21, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- I can see the original, ALT3 and ALT4 being doable, but ALT1 and ALT2's problem is that they'd need a source to back up that claim, and you can't do that on a DYK. I know the Dark of the Moon game was bad, but it's also unnecessary to get the point across. It makes it seem like an attack on that game. --Teancum (talk) 10:16, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Is the original DYK acceptable? I added two more, perhaps they are better? Also, if we ignore the opinions of critics then articles would be unable to say that anything created was ever bad. --Odie5533 (talk) 04:21, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
