- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 18:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Tony's Cronies
edit( )
- ... that Tony's Cronies included Tony Blair's (pictured) former boss, school friend and office manager appointed to official positions because of their personal friendships with Blair?
- Reviewed: Magnus Stamnestrø
Created by The C of E (talk). Self nominated at 07:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC).
Assuming the redirect thing is ok, then it would be good to go, I think. Long enough, hook cited online and very interesting. There might be a problem with the hookline though, as it appears to refer to three people but from what I can gather, the office manager and the school friend are the same person. A tweak may be necessary. -- Hillbillyholiday talk 23:52, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- OK, how about this? As for the redirect, the rules do say that former redirects count as new articles. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 07:24, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Alt1: ... that Tony's Cronies included Tony Blair's (pictured) former boss as well as his school friend and office manager, appointed to official positions because of their personal friendships with Blair?
- I think the "office manager" part is redundant. Also, I'm a bit concerned that the hookline statement is close to synthesis, maybe it would be better to say "reportedly because of their friendships", or something similar? Hillbillyholiday talk 12:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Alt2... that Tony's Cronies included Tony Blair's (pictured) former boss and school friend appointed to UK official positions reportedly because of their personal friendships with Blair? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 12:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
That seems fine to me now. -- Hillbillyholiday talk 13:02, 19 May 2013 (UTC)