Template:Did you know nominations/Tomb of Nadira Begum

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Arthistorygrrl (talk) 19:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Tomb of Nadira Begum edit

Created by Royroydeb (talk). Self nominated at 10:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC).

  • New enough, long enough, nominator is exempt from QPQ requirement per QPQ check. Every paragraph (except for the lead) has inline citations. A problem is that the reliability of the source used in the article to verify information in the hook (link) is questionable. It's a user subpage on the University of Alberta website, but no sources are cited to verify claims in the treatise. Is a more reliable source available to verify content? NORTH AMERICA1000 11:25, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
@Northamerica1000:, Hi is this a reliable source? RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 01:40, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Needs an answer. Maybe @Northamerica1000:? PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
I consider the Islamabad Pulse to be a reliable source. North America1000 17:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Content of the hook is now backed by a reliable source in the article. North America1000 17:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)