- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 23:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Titanoceratops edit
- ... that Titanoceratops was known from an almost complete skeleton that was assigned to Pentaceratops, and that the two were only distantly related?
5x expanded by Reid,iain james (talk). Self nominated at 02:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC).
Size-wise, 5x expand more than adequately satisfied. Only two DYK credits, so no QPQ needed. Sourcing looks fine, can't see any other issues. The hook is quite interesting in that it is relatively recent research (2011), and it certainly checks out with the article. Can't see any reason not to pass this. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
