Template:Did you know nominations/The Memoirs of Cleopatra

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Orlady (talk) 17:29, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

The Memoirs of Cleopatra edit

(

)

... that as a young girl, Margaret George became interested in Cleopatra because they both had dark hair, and later wrote a best-selling novel about her?

Reviewed: Hermann Kahan

5x expanded by Ruby2010 (talk). Self nominated at 05:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC).

expansion long enough, new enough, sources checks out to the statemtents. I think the hook is long enough so that should not be an issue. No copyvio, no disputes or dispute templates to be checked or removed. written in a neutral tone from what I can see as a non-biased reviewer. good 2 go.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

BabbaQ, this is not sufficient as a review: you've only checked two things: newness and size of expansion. There's far more to reviewing than that. I remind you that per T:TDYK#How to review a nomination, reviews should begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed. A full review is needed if you wish to claim QPQ credit for it. The aspects you should be covering are listed at the top when you edit this template page. Please be thorough. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

I have expanded the review.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

BabbaQ, in the future when you amplify upon your review comments after someone else has responded, please put your new comments at the bottom of the discussion and add a new signature and date stamp. Otherwise, contributors who are trying to build new hook sets have to do some archeology to figure out what's been done in the review. --Orlady (talk) 17:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

I'm promoting this to a prep area because I figured out that it truly has been approved according to protocol. --Orlady (talk) 17:29, 17 January 2014 (UTC)