Template:Did you know nominations/The J's with Jamie

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

The J's with Jamie edit

  • ... that Time magazine said The J's with Jamie "have probably been heard by more people more times than any other group in the history of sound. Yet next to nobody knows who they are."?
    • ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link], or briefly cite, the source)

Created by Rhododendrites (talk). Self-nominated at 20:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC).

  • Some issues found.
    • This article is new and was created on 15:29, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 4632 characters
    • Paragraphs [9] (All ... ABC.) in this article lack a citation.
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 24.8% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

  • fyi the paragraph with no cite is the discography and the copyvio is an attributed quote. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:23, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Full review needed by human reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Good to go. Double-checked the article, and confirming Rhododendrite's assessment. The Time article supporting the hook is subscription only, but the quote is viewable. Sources check out, no copyvios.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 16:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)