Template:Did you know nominations/The Eternaut 1969
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 00:40, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Eternaut 1969
- ... that Alberto Breccia shifted towards horror comics with The Eternaut 1969?
- ALT1 ... that The Eternaut 1969 is a reboot of the original comic, with an anti-imperialist tone?
- Source: García, Fernando; Ostuni, Hernán (September 2002). "Historieta & Sociedad: El Eternauta" [Comic books & Society: The Eternaut] (PDF). Revista latinoamericana de estudios sobre la historieta (in Spanish). La Habana, Cuba: Pablo de la Torriente Editorial. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
- Reviewed: No Obligation
Moved to mainspace by Cambalachero (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 119 past nominations.
Cambalachero (talk) 19:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC).
- @Cambalachero:
not a full review, but I'm not sure how this hook leave[s] the reader wanting to know more. Is there another hook that could be used? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 04:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Cambalachero: Please address the above. Z1720 (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- An alternate hook has already been proposed Cambalachero (talk) 20:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Lots of unsourced content. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 06:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Just jumping in to say that plot sections are not usually required to have references per WP:PLOTSOURCE.--Launchballer 12:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Just checked again, just in case, and all sections other than the plot (which, as pointed, does not need references) are well referenced. Cambalachero (talk) 13:46, 5 August 2024 (UTC)