Template:Did you know nominations/The Colours of Animals

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:45, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

The Colours of Animals edit

Skunk

Created/expanded by Chiswick Chap (talk). Self nom at 10:45, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Article is 5x expanded, more than 1500 characters, hook is interesting enough and properly sourced, QPQ done, picture is in the article too. Good to go. AARONTALK 16:41, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Over two-thirds of this article's prose is directly quoted. While given the age of most of the material this isn't a copyright issue, it is a style issue - that's too much quoting, and the article would be better served by replacing some of the longer quotes with short ones and paraphrases. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:17, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Done - quotes mainly summarized or shortened, have tested all for strict relevance. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:13, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
While I still think the quoting's a bit much, it's good enough for DYK. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:56, 2 December 2012 (UTC)