Template:Did you know nominations/Tauzieher

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 01:44, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Tauzieher edit

The Tauzieher in Rheinauhafen

  • ... that the Tauzieher (pictured), a statue in Rheinauhafen, ended up being twice the size of what was originally planned?

Created/expanded by Thine Antique Pen (talk), Fox2k11 (talk), Yngvadottir (talk). Nominated by Thine Antique Pen (talk) at 20:06, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Translation from German wiki but have you verified the sources? I'd replace with ones you can verify yourself in google books as much as you can.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:10, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Looked at them in snippet view, at the most, and seem OK. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 21:16, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Really? How did you find Localanzeiger: Nr. 83 vom, Kölnisches Tageblatt Nr. 435, ? Just scrap the sources and at least ry to replce them with fuller google book sources. It doesn't take look to google info and try to pick up something. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:44, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
I mean that I found many of them. Anyway, I have loaded the article with Google Books sources. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 21:57, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
"The anonymous author of a poem in September 1911 to the opposition of the naked Tauzieher, symbolising by him with the message that prosperity can develop at any who loves working: "

You sure this has been copyedited after the translation?♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:58, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Looks OK to me, but I'm sure our resident expert will decide on whether its good to go or not, Ceocil?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:15, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Ahem, hold on. The original hook is misleading and the second is way blah. I propose:
Should be good to go this time, any hook suggestion will do..♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:09, 17 October 2012 (UTC)