- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Redtigerxyz Talk 05:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Tauá edit
... that the toponymy of Tauá, a municipality in the Brazilian state of Ceará, refers to an indigenous word meaning "yellow clay and loam" in the Tupi language?
Created/expanded by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Rosiestep (talk). Nominated by Dr. Blofeld (talk) at 06:59, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Reviewed Téviec.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:03, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewed Aplastodiscus callipygius. --Rosiestep (talk) 01:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that Jovita Feitosa of Tauá was not allowed to fight in the Paraguayan War?--Rosiestep (talk) 04:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- ALT 1 is better, but I wonder if a slight reference to her gender could be added. igordebraga ≠ 00:56, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- ALT2: ... that Jovita Feitosa of Tauá was not allowed to fight in the Paraguayan War because of her gender? --Rosiestep (talk) 13:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
ALT 2 seems good enough now. igordebraga ≠ 01:30, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Reading the above, I see no statement that either article has actually been reviewed, just that the hook is okay. Can the reviewer please confirm that all the proper DYK checks have been done to both articles in the ALT2 hook? Should the original hook be struck because the preference is for a double hook? And finally, I believe that Rosiestep should do a QPQ for Jovita Feitosa. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)- It passes criterion #2 (both are over 2500 characters) and #3. #1... well both got expanded on Oct 17, but given the backlog goes as far back as August, that must be no problem. igordebraga ≠ 01:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Good to know: they definitely pass the five-day rule. But I meant all the criteria, including things like neutrality (hook and articles), close paraphrasing, etc. Did you do all the checks? If they haven't yet been done, we need to find someone to do them. One problem that does need to be fixed (it's an easy fix, but has to be done) is that Tauá is classified as a stub, and needs to be reclassified before it can be passed. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:50, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
-
- If I stated it passed Criteria 3, it's because it's all OK - the articles are neutral and well-referenced. igordebraga ≠ 03:07, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- Up to you to give a new tick, then. I've struck the original hook to make sure Jovita gets her day in the sun. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:15, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
OK. It's ready to go now. igordebraga ≠ 21:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
