Template:Did you know nominations/Swoon of the Virgin

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 03:48, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Swoon of the Virgin edit

(

)

... that art showing a fainting Virgin Mary (example illustrated) became less common in the 16th century, after attacks by theologians?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/White Horse Pagoda, Dunhuang

Created/expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self nom at 15:24, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Everything's OK except for the last two sentences of the third graf of the history section (However no more official condemnation of the belief in the incident came, and a much reduced level of depictions continued. Depictions placed in time after the Crucifixion itself avoided many of the theological objections.) lacking a cite. Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Rewritten and referenced. Johnbod (talk) 03:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Length and history verified; ref accepted GF. Good now. Daniel Case (talk) 07:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)