Template:Did you know nominations/Superconducting tunnel junction

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:46, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Superconducting tunnel junction edit

Created/expanded by Tls60 (talk). Self nom at 16:26, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Not created or substantially expanded within the past 5 days. Article has been gradually expanded since August 14. rʨanaɢ (talk) 17:59, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
  • I'm passing it. Everything in the article checks out, and it's a great article in general. Rjanag's concern I don't think applies, major editing did indeed end on the nom date, which I believe is the major concern. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:11, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
BTW, on the hook side of things, wouldn't single photon detection be more "hooky", like:
... that superconducting tunnel junctions are so sensitive they can detect single photons?
  • DYK check shows no 5x expansion in 690 days. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Prose counter, or History numbers? Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Maury, the major concern is when the major editing began, not when it ended. The idea is, an article needs to be 5x bigger now than it was five days ago. rʨanaɢ (talk) 20:46, 6 September 2011 (UTC)