Template:Did you know nominations/Stowe Gardens 2

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 14:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Stowe Gardens

Temple of British Worthies (front)
Temple of British Worthies (front)

Improved to Good Article status by Lajmmoore (talk). Self-nominated at 14:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Stowe Gardens 2; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • @Lajmmoore: Improved to good article status. 98.4% match for copyright violations. I think someone needs to have a look and determine if this is a mirror or copy pasted. The image is clear and has the correct license and FOP exists in the image location. The hook is cited and interesting. Hold for now until CC is determined. Bruxton (talk) 20:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
    Thanks for the review Bruxton, just to add for context the Stowe Gardens page was initially a split from the Stowe House page. I moved the content from there in good faith. In terms of the copyvio, the VIPA page seems to me to be mirroring the content when it was on the Stowe House page originally? This link suggests that the page was first archived by Google in May 2015 & this link is the page in March 2015. If you compare the two, the content on the Stowe House page, under the subheading Stowe Landscape Gardens seems to be what the VIPA page is based on. I'd be really pleased if another pair of eyes could take a look at it to confirm Lajmmoore (talk) 09:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
& a further note, at the request of TSventon (which I should have originally put in the nomination), is that working on the Stowe Gardens page and submitting a DYK nomination was part of a paid pilot scheme for the National Trust. There's more detail on this here. Lajmmoore (talk) 16:44, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
  • I can AGF on the mirror. I was stalled out looking at the "paid pilot scheme" called out above. I will also leave a ping for @Theleekycauldron: to make sure we are good for green. Bruxton (talk) 15:19, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
    • @Bruxton: if the article's not a copyright violation, we're good on that front; I'm kind of wondering whether there are any restrictions on DYK paid editing post-Gibraltar controversy, but I can't find anything, so I think it's good to go. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 01:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Thank you much for the opinion @Theleekycauldron:! I moved the green tick. Bruxton (talk) 01:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)