Template:Did you know nominations/Storia de Mahometh

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Storia de Mahometh

(

)

... that the earliest Latin translation of any part of the Quran is a single verse in the Storia de Mahometh? Source: Wolf 2014, p. 15 n11: "The portion of the Storia dedicated to the Zaynab incident is actually a Latin translation of Qurʾan 33:37, making it the first known Latin translation of any portion of the Qurʾan."
- ALT1: ... that while accepting the basic facts of Muhammad's life as given in the Islamic tradition, the Christian Storia de Mahometh gives a negative interpretation of every one? Source: Wolf 2014, p. 15: "the Latin author twisted for polemical effect each and every historical datum that he pilfered from the official account of the Prophet."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Thihapate II of Taungdwin

Created by Srnec (talk). Self-nominated at 03:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

good to go with the original hook, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 07:40, 27 May 2022 (UTC)