Template:Did you know nominations/Steven Naismith

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Not long enough

Steven Naismith

edit

2x expanded and sourced (BLP) by Monkeymanman (talk), Johnelwaq (talk). Nominated by Monkeymanman (talk) at 13:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Hook review for original hook
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Hook review for ALT1
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism
  • I hate to be a party pooper, but this has been a well-cited blp for over four years now [1]. The prose has not been expanded five-fold over this four year period either. Thus, I reject this nomination. On a positive note, the article seems well on the way to being worthy of a good article or WikiProject "A" class review. SFB 11:45, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Fair enough, i was having second thoughts about nominating but like you have said it is far more inclusive and better sourced now.Monkeymanman (talk) 17:47, 1 October 2011 (UTC)