Template:Did you know nominations/Stephen Farrow

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Stephen Farrow edit

  • ... that police struggled to investigate double murderer Stephen Farrow, because of his nomadic lifestyle?

Created by The Almightey Drill (talk). Self-nominated at 05:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC).

  • New enough and long enough. QPQ will be fine as long as you follow up being pinged there. The source placed at the end of the sentence in the article only backs up that "an anonymous phonecall from a woman in Kent had led to his arrest", it doesn't back up the first half of the sentence which asserts that tracking Farrow was difficult due to his nomadic lifestyle. Going to need an inline citation for that one. Freikorp (talk) 08:59, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
    • In the source, the inspector says "He was a drifter who had no ties to any particular area of the country which made him a difficult individual to investigate." Nonetheless, I have repeated the reference inline to clarify the matter '''tAD''' (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
QPQ followed up. Spot checks finds no signs of close paraphrasing. Now that you've pointed it out I don't think the double inline citation is necessary. As long as using the term 'nomadic lifestyle' is OK considering that that term doesn't appear in the source is fine this one is good to go. Freikorp (talk) 12:22, 22 October 2015 (UTC)