Template:Did you know nominations/Star Wars: Jedi Arena
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Star Wars: Jedi Arena edit
- ... that Guinness World Records commended Star Wars: Jedi Arena for being the first Star Wars video game to feature lightsaber combat?
- ALT1: ... that Star Wars: Jedi Arena is the first Star Wars video game to feature lightsaber combat?
- Reviewed: Fire Emblem: Mystery of the Emblem, Deus Ex Go, ReCore, Crispy Gamer
Improved to Good Article status by Gamingforfun365 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:50, 21 December 2016 (UTC).
Every statement in the article is sourced. Article became a GA in the required timeframe. Both hooks are short and interesting, but I would prefer #2 as it is more interesting and emphasizes that it is the first Star Wars game with lightsaber combat, as #1 seems to give emphasis on GWR rather than the game itself. QPQ provided. In either case, the hook is cited in the article. Well done! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Narutolovehinata5, your review has not covered all of the DYK criteria, including two of the three "within policy" criteria, neutrality and close paraphrasing. Please complete the review. Many thanks. (A QPQ is not required, since this is the nominator's first DYK nomination; the only prior DYK credit was nominated by another editor.) BlueMoonset (talk) 06:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: Whoops, forgot to mention those. But in any case, the article meets the requirements I missed as well (I also ran the DYK check tool to confirm). As for the QPQ thing, while not required yet, one was provided, which is why I mentioned it. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- Narutolovehinata5, thanks! I have removed the icon I placed above, so this nomination can proceed with your original tick. Please be sure to specify each of the criteria that you've checked in your future reviews; it prevents delays when a promoter comes along. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: Whoops, forgot to mention those. But in any case, the article meets the requirements I missed as well (I also ran the DYK check tool to confirm). As for the QPQ thing, while not required yet, one was provided, which is why I mentioned it. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)