Template:Did you know nominations/Soup the Chemist

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 07:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Soup the Chemist edit

Created by The Cross Bearer (talk). Nominated by 3family6 (talk) at 20:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC).

  • 1. New. Created on February 1 at 4:56 hours (UTC); nominated February 8 at 20:55 (UTC). Yes
  • 2. Long enough. Circa 1700 characters.
  • 3. Within policy. Yes.
  • 4. Format. Yes. I also recommend to link Christian hip hop in the hook.
  • 5. Content. Yes.
  • 6. QPQ. Yes

I don't know if it still "old enough". Probably it is. But I need a second opinion about it. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 00:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

  • The nominations list for the 8th, which this was part of, was still in the "current nominations" section when I nominated the article. I'm fine with you deferring to another editor, though.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 03:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Second opinion: Tbhotch, this was definitely on time. We invariably give until the end of the seventh day after creation/expansion/listing for the article to be nominated, and this was nominated on that seventh day. I think the people writing the rules would have specified 168 hours if they'd wanted that exact period. Note that times are based on UTC, though I can't imagine that if someone was a couple of hours late a touch of WP:IAR wouldn't be extended in courtesy if requested. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I wasn't that sure about this ruling. In my view it is good to go. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 00:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)