Template:Did you know nominations/Sophie Wong

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 05:20, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Sophie Wong edit

Created/expanded by Raintheone (talk). Self nom at 02:15, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Note to reviewer: This article was an userspace draft moved to mainspace on July 8. Chris857 (talk) 02:41, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
  • New enough, long enough, good sourcing (the unsourced section, "storylines" is fine without, like the plot of a book. Some references would be better, but aren't necessary.). Hook is referenced. No CP concerns from the couple of references I checked. QPQ satisfied. Some interest in the hook, although I would strongly recommend appending "in Winners & Losers" (or even "in Australian TV series Winners & Losers") to it for context. Otherwise good to go. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 14:00, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
  • The source of the hook fact was Melanie Vallejo herself. Is this considered a reliable source? How about: ... that Melanie Vallejo claimed/revealed/admitted in an interview that she had not done much preparation before auditioning for the role of Sophie Wong in the Australian television series Winners & Losers? --PFHLai (talk) 21:52, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Well as I say I'm a fan of adding the series at the end, but I think we can trust Vallejo on her own preparation; per WP:SELFPUB Self-published and questionable sources may be used ... so long as: (1) the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim... . Ultimately I don't mind but I think your alt is a bit long. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 21:59, 14 July 2012 (UTC)