- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Launchballer talk 19:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Solid South
County results, 1928
- ... that between 1892 and 1944, only in 1928 did the Democrats lose any counties (pictured) in Mississippi in any presidential election?
- Source: [1]
- Reviewed:
Created by JohnAdams1800 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
JohnAdams1800 (talk) 18:06, 4 August 2024 (UTC).
The article is the result of a major rewrite over much of this summer, which appears to have increased the quality quite a bit. Unfortunately however, it does not as far as I can determine fulfil the DYK criterion of being new enough, in that no five-fold expansion has taken place in the last seven days before it was DYK-nominated. Unless I have missed something completely in this regard, I am afraid it is not eligible for DYK. Yakikaki (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Following a brief discussion on my talk page, I understand now that the nominator wanted to nominate this DYK in connection with the article getting GA status. I believe the nominator didn't understand the process fully, that it has to be nominated for DYK after passing GA, not after being nominated for GA. Some more experienced user can perhaps advise how we should proceed in this case. Should the nomination be failed (and can it then be re-submitted once the article has passed GA?), or can it be withdrawn somehow? Yakikaki (talk) 18:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Presidential election of 1900 – Map by Counties (and subsequent years)