Template:Did you know nominations/So God Made a Farmer

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of So God Made a Farmer's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 11:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC).

So God Made a Farmer edit

Created by Ryan Vesey (talk). Self nom at 18:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Article length is fine, creation date is new enough, no copyvio or plagiarism noted, sources are extensive. I think the word, "add" in the hook needs to be changed to "ad", "advertisement" or "commercial". Mgrē@sŏn 21:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
  • I'm from 'Merica, I ain't needin no spellin lessons. Just kidding, I've fixed it, thanks for the catch. Ryan Vesey 22:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
This seems to have been sitting here for awhile now, so I guess it's okay for me to pick up for review?
  • Article - created new on 4 February, so new enough when nominated; 5455 characters of readable prose excluding quotes, so certainly sufficient length; neutral; every paragraph has inline citations; no copy vios detected using earwig; not a stub - actually it's passed as GA (so easily meets DYK - providing that doesn't disqualify it for DYK!)
  • Hook - well within length criteria at 102 characters; correctly formatted; correctly cited/supported by ref #10; and interesting.
  • QPQ done; image used is US PD but not used in DYK anyway.
Looks fine to me and spelling looks fine too - all as I would expect with a GA!. My apologies to all concerned if I shouldn't have stepped in to review this. SagaciousPhil - Chat 12:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC)