- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Sohom Datta talk 03:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
SiegedSec
- ... that NATO was once targeted by a group of "gay furry hackers"?
Moved to mainspace by B3251 (talk) and PixyPoxxy (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 18 past nominations.
B3251(talk) 17:37, 11 July 2024 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
- Personally, I'd format the "Notable attacks" section as prose, rather than as a bulleted list. As it is, the article has just over 1,500 prose characters, so this isn't a requirement, just a suggestion.
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems: - Although it is technically correct that NATO has been targeted by "gay furry hackers" in the past, the wording "has been" might mislead people into thinking that the hacking is currently ongoing. I'd suggest something along the lines of "... that NATO was once targeted by a group of "gay furry hackers"?".
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
@B3251 and PixyPoxxy: Nice work on this article. I had a few comments above, but otherwise there don't seem to be any other issues with this nomination. Epicgenius (talk) 18:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: Thanks for the review. I've changed the hook. B3251(talk) 18:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Looks good to me. Epicgenius (talk) 18:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)