- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 00:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Siege of Perth (1339)
- ... that a warrant was issued to pay a force to relieve the Siege of Perth two months after the garrison had surrendered this day in 1339?
Moved to mainspace by
CSJJ104 (
talk).
Number of QPQs required:
1. Nominator has 14 past nominations.
CSJJ104 (talk) 20:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC).
- After rereading this, possibly this is a better wording?
- Alt1 ... that a warrant was issued to pay a force to relieve the Siege of Perth in October 1339, after the garrison had already surrendered on 17 August? CSJJ104 (talk) 00:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall:
Nice new article, well sourced (to mostly offline sources) and a sufficiently interesting hook (Alt1). I added a '1339,' and 'already' to Alt1; perhaps the '17 August' isn't needed at all? QPQ requirement is complete.
Chaiten1 (
talk) 16:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Nice new article, well sourced (to mostly offline sources) and a sufficiently interesting hook (Alt1). I added a '1339,' and 'already' to Alt1; perhaps the '17 August' isn't needed at all? QPQ requirement is complete. Chaiten1 (talk) 16:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)