The following is an archived discussion of Shyte Brook's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 01:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC).
Shit Brook edit
- ... that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire?
Created by The C of E (talk). Self nom at 17:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC).
It's only showing 1415 characters at the moment; it does look as if it could easily be increased to 1500 characters as I've had a sneeky look at the refs. SagaciousPhil - Chat 17:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Just pushed it over. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 18:04, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Article is new enough created 13 February; no copy vios; and neutral.
- Hook is def concise, correctly formatted; and cited.
- However, still showing as 1499 characters when I run DYK check; a couple of refs need to be sorted - #5 and #7.... SagaciousPhil - Chat 18:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- I've made it longer. I can't see what else I can do with the refs as 5 won't link for some reason and 7 is reffing a TV episode not an online source. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 18:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- now DYK check scanning at 1504 characters; I think (hope) I've sorted the refs; no image; QPQ done.
Seems to tick the boxes now SagaciousPhil - Chat 18:58, 13 February 2013 (UTC)