Template:Did you know nominations/Shelling of Stepanakert
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 19:04, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Shelling of Stepanakert edit
- Did you know that the shelling of Stepanakert, during the Nagorno-Karabakh War caused mass casualties and widespread damage?
Created/expanded by Nocturnal781 (talk). Self nom at 02:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewed Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 08:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Normally I would just edit such a hook in place, without comment, but since it was "reviewed" without the second article bold, I'm adding the correctly formatted hook below as an ALT. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 19:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the shelling of Stepanakert, during the Nagorno-Karabakh War, caused mass casualties and widespread damage?
- ... however, now that I've looked at Nagorno-Karabakh War, I see that it was 74k, has not been expanded, and has appeared on the Main Page as TFA. As it's ineligible, I've unbolded it, and removed it from three places: the section heading, {{DYK nompage links}}, and {{DYKmake}}. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 19:38, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- ALT2: ... that the month long shelling of Stepanakert, during the Nagorno-Karabakh War, caused mass civilian casualties and widespread damage?
- ALT3: ... that the month long shelling of Stepanakert, during the Nagorno-Karabakh War, specifically targeted civilians?
long enough, new enough, inline citations, but I am unclear about what some of them are. I cannot figure out who the publishers are of 1, 2, and 4 (I did not look beyond there) I think that the hook needs work. I suggested two ALTs.--Ishtar456 (talk) 23:28, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- See here: [1], [2] and 4 is published by the Human Rights Watch. Nocturnal781 (talk) 19:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- perhaps you should format them the way #9 is. AS they are, your citation are confusing.--Ishtar456 (talk) 21:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Its the title of the material than the author, and page number. I'm not good at using those other reference templates, I haven't used them at all but I'll do what I can to learn it and fix it. Nocturnal781 (talk) 07:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
