Template:Did you know nominations/Sheldon Kurland

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Sheldon Kurland edit

Created by Orlady (talk). Self nom at 05:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

  • , length, hook all look ok to me. Nice read as well. Great job. – Connormah (talk) 22:52, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination approval put on hold until QPQ has been completed. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I know that. I don't believe in counting old reviews as QPQs, and I've been too preoccupied with other matters to have done a QPQ concurrent with this nomination. --Orlady (talk) 17:11, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
I was sure you did know that, but Connormah had clearly missed it, since a tick shouldn't be given while the QPQ remains to be done. Is there any reason you aren't willing to claim your extensive work on Template:Did you know nominations/Grootegeluk Coal Mine, Waterberg Coalfield as a QPQ? Even if the nomination ultimately did not prosper, your work identifying close paraphrasing and fixing it would seem to me to qualify. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:56, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
If you'll accept that as a QPQ, BlueMoonset, it works for me. --Orlady (talk) 05:59, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Not necessary. I just did an honest-to-goodness fresh QPQ review. --Orlady (talk) 16:44, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
  • QPQ satisfied; restoring tick per Connormah. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:20, 26 January 2013 (UTC)