Template:Did you know nominations/Shaiva Upanishads
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:54, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Akshamalika Upanishad, Bhasmajabala Upanishad, Brihajjabala Upanishad, Kalagni Rudra Upanishad, Rudrakshajabala Upanishad edit
( Back to T:TDYK )
- ... that the Akshamalika Upanishad, the Bhasmajabala Upanishad, the Brihajjabala Upanishad, the Kalagni Rudra Upanishad, and the Rudrakshajabala Upanishad glorify Shaiva sectarian practices, such as smearing ash on the body (pictured)?
Moved to mainspace by Nvvchar (talk), Redtigerxyz (talk). Nominated by Redtigerxyz (talk) at 09:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC).
- Please mention the source/s you are citing here for the hook. Image detailsis unclear "pictured[who?] with ash on forehead" --Tito Dutta (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Tito Dutta, Klaus K. Klostermaier is cited in each article for the hook. The featured picture depicts a Shaiva sadhu. Redtigerxyz Talk 04:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Full review needed, including of all five articles. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Good to go. Picture -- I don't know whether that sadhu is a Shaiva -- but okay. --Tito Dutta (talk) 09:38, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Tito Dutta, "good to go" is not an acceptable review at DYK. There are five articles, each of which needs a full review that covers all of the criteria listed in the space above the edit box: newness, size, neutral, sourced, free of copyvio/close paraphrasing, and hook interest, sourcing and neutrality. Please specify for each what was checked and what you found. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:12, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Starting review:
- Akshamalika Upanishad: New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. The first part of the hook, about glorifying sectarian practices, is cited inline with an offline ref (AGF), but nothing is said about the ash example. Yoninah (talk) 19:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Bhasmajabala Upanishad: New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. Image appears in this article and is freely-licensed. Online hook ref verified, offline hook ref AGF, and both cited inline. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 19:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Brihajjabala Upanishad: New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. Image appears in this article and is freely-licensed. Online hook ref verified, offline hook ref AGF, and both cited inline. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 19:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Kalagni Rudra Upanishad: New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. Image appears in this article and is freely-licensed. Online hook ref verified, offline hook ref AGF, and both cited inline. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 19:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Rudrakshajabala Upanishad: New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. Image appears in this article and is freely-licensed. Offline hook ref AGF and cited inline. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 20:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
In summary, all 5 articles include the line about glorifying Shaivan sectarian practices, which is AGF and cited inline. The example of the ash is cited in 3 of the articles (it does not have an inline cite in Rudrakshajabala Upanishad), and is not mentioned at all in Akshamalika Upanishad. Four of the articles (excepting Akshamalika Upanishad) have the image. Since previous practice shows that it is not necessary to have the same hook fact/image in all nominations in a multiple hook, this nomination satisfies all requirements and is good to go. I moved the (pictured) to the end of the hook for clarity. 5 QPQs done. Yoninah (talk) 20:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
