Template:Did you know nominations/Shadrake v. Attorney-General

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 09:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Shadrake v. Attorney-General

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that in Shadrake v. Attorney-General, where a British journalist was charged for scandalizing the Singapore courts, the Court of Appeal declined to apply the American "clear and present danger" test?

• Reviewed: Fathom.com
• Comment: The article was created on 5 October 2012 by moving it from a sandbox. The hook is evidenced by footnotes 59 and 60.

Created/expanded by Chuajz (talk), mak.2010 (talk), Rachloke (talk), Thjgerald (talk), and Timothy.mak.2010 (talk). Nominated by mak (talk) at 21:00, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

• Article qualifies for DYK under the newness and length criteria and has a well-referenced hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:30, 11 October 2012 (UTC)