Template:Did you know nominations/Sally Brampton

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Sally Brampton edit

  • ... that Sally Brampton was the first editor of the British edition of French magazine Elle?
  • ALT1:... that Sally Brampton was the first editor of the British edition of French magazine Elle, which published its first issue in November 1985?
  • ALT2:... that Sally Brampton was the first editor of the British edition of French magazine Elle, which debuted in November 1985?
  • ALT3:... that Sally Brampton was The Sunday Times's agony aunt in its Style supplement?
  • ALT4:... that Sally Brampton was The Sunday Times's agony aunt?
  • Reviewed: Hemifaveoloolithus
  • Comment: The QPQ was previously used for the failed nomination of 2016 Donald Trump Chicago rally protest. If that is not acceptable, I'll find another QPQ then. Also, she is nominated as part of ITN's "Recent Deaths", which does not disqualify this biography from DYK eligibility. In fact, her death may not be blurbed in ITN.

Created by Edwardx (talk) and Philip Cross (talk). Nominated by George Ho (talk) at 18:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC).

  • Comment: Article long enough and no obvious copyvio. The hook is correctly cited; I would prefer ALT1. The only thing I question is if the QPQ is acceptable? (I frankly do not know), Huldra (talk) 21:56, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Rather than leave this hanging around indefinitely, I suggest we accept the QPQ, and if not I can donate one of my excess QPQs. I agree with Huldra that the article qualifies for DYK on newness and length. Any of the hooks could be used as all have inline citations. The article is neutral, and the spotchecks I made did not throw up any copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)