Template:Did you know nominations/Sahlen Field

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Sahlen Field

Sahlen Field
Sahlen Field

Improved to Good Article status by TheNewMinistry (talk). Self-nominated at 17:40, 26 August 2022 (UTC).

  • Newly promoted GA - long enough, well cited, neutral, and no copyvio issues. QPQ not needed. Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and works at this scale. I think that the field having the top 6 season attendance records could be a punchier hook (though the wording might need adjusted) - @TheNewMinistry:, how do you feel about that? That information is in a table in the article, though I think it'd be worthwhile being in the prose as well. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 14:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
    • I like your alternate version. Yeah I think even if not included in the prose, putting a mention of the attendance record(s) and also the record of 49 games as an alternate MLB venue in the header is probably worthwhile.TheNewMinistry (talk) 16:29, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
      • Good to go with ALT1, then. I've added the hook fact in the article prose. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC)