Template:Did you know nominations/Robert P. Armstrong

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 18:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Robert P. Armstrong edit

Justice Armstrong in 2017.
Justice Armstrong in 2017.

5x expanded by Patar knight (talk). Self-nominated at 08:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC).

  • This article is a five-fold expansion. It is new enough and long enough. The image is appropriately licensed, the hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. The creator appears to have five previous DYKs. Theoretically he should do a QPQ review but I am donating one of my spare reviews because his talk page states that he is wikibonked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this, but I don't find the hook hooky. It seems to introduce too many facts, diverting from the main subject. Instead of explaining what the Dubin Inquiry was, perhaps have a shorter version of the hook focusing on the hooky details. Alternately, you may wish to create a hook with details from another of his interesting cases. Yoninah (talk) 20:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
@Yoninah: I've proposed an alt-blurb that focuses more on Justice Armstrong's work during the inquiry. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:41, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I have rearranged ALT1 for clarity and it has suitable inline citations. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:00, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Let's go with ALT2. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)