- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 22:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Rob Saxton edit
- ... that educational administrator Rob Saxton is the first non-elected leader of Oregon public schools?
- Reviewed: First time DYK nomination
Created/expanded by Comrade Napoleon (talk). Self nom at 18:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced this article satisfies the notability requirements. See my comments on the article's talk page. — Richwales 03:32, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Absent an AfD or other attempt to delete, and with over three weeks having passed without any action at the article, I think perhaps a review here might be in order. If an AfD does begin, of course, any action here must be put on hold, and if the reviewer agrees with you and also feels its appropriate to initiate an action, that could be done. But the submission can't simply sit here forever. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:08, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
The author has retired, so I won't be able to contact this user about problems with this article. In fact, this article is missing some inline citations. I hope citation issues are remedied soon. --George Ho (talk) 17:50, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
The "Restructuring" section may or may not be relevant to this person, and one paragraph may be missing citations. That aside, I have found an inline citation for one passage. Rest of this article is fine as is. --George Ho (talk) 18:45, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- I sent this off to AfD. Drmies (talk) 14:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Saxton now concluded, with the result being "no consensus due to lack of agreement over what the relevant notability guidelines are". --PFHLai (talk) 17:42, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
- My feeling is that a no-consensus close isn't really the sort of strong endorsement of notability we'd like to have for something appearing on our front page. But maybe others disagree. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:00, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- I sent this off to AfD. Drmies (talk) 14:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Still has a citation needed and dated info tag. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
