Template:Did you know nominations/Rita Cléos

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 12:53, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Rita Cléos edit

  • ... that Rita Cléos (pictured) was the first actress filmed in a bathing scene on Brazilian TV?

Created by Rosiestep (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk), Ата (talk), and Krenakarore (talk). Nominated by Rosiestep (talk) at 13:50, 23 June 2014 (UTC).

Criteria:
  • New: Met, article created on June 22.
  • Long enough: Met, article has 1933 characters.
  • Within policy:
  • Neutral: Met, article seems neutral to the topic.
  • cites sources with inline citations: A few things here:
  • She died in Curitiba, murdered in unexplained circumstances. A claim like that needs a citation...........
  • What makes meadd.com a reliable source? It appears to be a social media site.
  • No references should be in all-caps.
  • Check citations that need the Portuguese language parameter.
  • Reference 7 doesn't mention all actors listed in our article.
  • Justify reference 11, it looks like a fan site according to [1]. It has a biography of her [2] which has some new information if you can verify it somewhere else.
  • is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism:
  • It would be a benefit to add Template:Translated page to the talkpage, with the specific Portuguese version translated.
  • No copyright issues from references themselves, checked references 6 and 10 with Google Translate.
  • Format: Met, hook is 95 characters.
  • Content: Met, hook from a reliable source (Universo Online) and verified by Google Translate and my very limited understanding of Portuguese. Hook is neutral and interesting.
  • Image: Some concerns here:
  • Image license states that "I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain." I don't think that's possible with a still from a movie. A Google reverse search finds that the image is housed on several blogs but there's no evidence of its copyright status. Admittedly I'm not familiar with copyright law of Brazil and my conclusion could be fallacious.
  • That image upload is the only contribution that account ever made, making the image copyright seem suspicious.
  • Get back to me if the image doesn't fall under copyright in Brazil, but if you can't find anything regarding the subject, the image should be deleted; of course a fair-use image would be appropriate, and you can upload the same image under that rationale if you should so choose.

Respond to these comments and get back to me about the status of the article and image. Seattle (talk) 13:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

@Seattle: Thank you for the extremely comprehensive review. I believe I have addressed all the issues. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Good to go. Seattle (talk) 11:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)