Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/Reginald Uren

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Reginald Uren

edit
(
)

Created by DavidCane (talk). Self nominated at 03:48, 1 November 2014 (UTC).


Article

  • New – Article is new enough, it was created on 1 November (+10UTC), and nominated later that day.
  • Long enough – The article was 2255 characters at time of nomination.
  • Within policy – The article is neutral in tone.
    It is well supported by citations, however, five of 12 are not publicly viewable. Given that I have followed Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide#Review the article(s) and varified what I can with the remaining sources. I must admit they aren't overly substantive, but they do varify other facts, and corrispond correctly with the claims they are supporting, I will therefore WP:AGF, with one query:
  • In 'Life and work' para 2, citation #3 just states he trained in London under Holden, does cite #1 name University of London?
    • Thanks for asking. Cite #1 (Who Was Who) gives University of London under the education heading. Cite #5 also mentions that he studied at London University "for a short period under Professor A. E. Richardson A. R. A".--DavidCane (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
From what I can tell, it is free from any form of close paraphrasing or plagiarism, but this again relies on good faith, given I can only cross-check about half the citations. Still, I can hardly fail it on that.

Hook

  • Format – The hook is short enough.
  • Content – The hook is supported by a citation, however, the citation is not publicly viewable. I'm willing to approve it, as it is sourced, but defer to the closer as to if this is the right decision or not.
    • Both the Who Was Who and The Times Digital Archive websites are freely accessible to most UK library cardholders; so if anyone has one, they might be able to check. The Eitan Karol book used for citation #6 is one I used when I wrote the featured article on Charles Holden and the featured list on his works. There is another source (here) for this (which I haven't used in Reginald Uren because it is more particularly about Charles Holden), but I have used it elsewhere. --DavidCane (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Other

  • QPQ – Nominator has reviewed Wyangala.
  • Image – No image has been submitted.
  • I reckon this article meets all requirements, but will defer passing until the query is addressed, sorry. ColonialGrid (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
  • With the additional information and clarification, I reckon this article is good to go.  ColonialGrid (talk) 21:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Reginald_Uren&oldid=632551819"