- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by The C of E (talk) 06:49, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Quintín Quintana
Created by Vami IV (talk), Roniius (talk), and 2x2leax (talk). Nominated by Vami IV (talk) at 11:29, 31 July 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall:
DrThneed (
talk) 05:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Article moved into mainspace 31 July, so is long enough and new enough. Earwig score of 20% is due to use of "the War of Pacific" and an article title, so not of concern. The source describes Quintana as a "well-heeled Chinese merchant" who had previously arrived in Peru as a coolie. It also says "Quintı´n Quintana assumed leadership of a Chinese sworn brotherhood and functioned as an enganche boss to the Chilean army" in 1881, which is during the War of the Pacific, so I think covers the second part of the hook. Just one comment, you might consider using "enslaved people" rather than "slaves" in the article.
DrThneed (
talk) 05:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
DrThneed (talk) 05:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Article moved into mainspace 31 July, so is long enough and new enough. Earwig score of 20% is due to use of "the War of Pacific" and an article title, so not of concern. The source describes Quintana as a "well-heeled Chinese merchant" who had previously arrived in Peru as a coolie. It also says "Quintı´n Quintana assumed leadership of a Chinese sworn brotherhood and functioned as an enganche boss to the Chilean army" in 1881, which is during the War of the Pacific, so I think covers the second part of the hook. Just one comment, you might consider using "enslaved people" rather than "slaves" in the article. DrThneed (talk) 05:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)