Template:Did you know nominations/Pulp (manga magazine)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:21, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pulp (manga magazine), Animerica Extra
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that the American manga magazines Pulp and Animerica Extra were launched to capitalize on the boom in the popularity of anime among English-language audiences in the 1990s? Source: Manga in America: Transnational Book Publishing and the Domestication of Japanese Comics
- ALT1:... that Pulp and Animerica Extra were among the first outlets to publish English-language translations of manga for a young adult and adult audience? Source: Manga in America: Transnational Book Publishing and the Domestication of Japanese Comics
- Reviewed: Precious Plastic, Dave Hakkens
- Comment: Pulp is a new article, Animerica Extra is 5x expanded.
Created by Morgan695 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC).
- Both articles are long enough and new/expanded enough. Double QPQ has been done. No obvious copyvio concerns. Suggested hook facts appear interesting and accurate, but aren't really stated as such in the articles, and the citation given here doesn't quite say the same thing.
Can the citations/connection to the hook be made more precise? —Kusma (t·c) 10:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Kusma: Alt hook below. Morgan695 (talk)
- ALT2:... that the magazines Pulp and Animerica Extra have been called "instrumental in disseminating manga culture" in North America? Source: The Rough Guide to Manga, "[Viz] also launched several magazines, which were instrumental in disseminating manga culture, including […] Animerica Extra (1998-2004) and Pulp (1997-2002)"
- @Morgan695: Happy to approve ALT2 (but it would improve things to have the "instrumental" claim also in the article Animerica Extra, and to also cite it to The Rough Guide to Manga there).
—Kusma (t·c) 16:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Morgan695: Happy to approve ALT2 (but it would improve things to have the "instrumental" claim also in the article Animerica Extra, and to also cite it to The Rough Guide to Manga there).
- Both articles are long enough and new/expanded enough. Double QPQ has been done. No obvious copyvio concerns. Suggested hook facts appear interesting and accurate, but aren't really stated as such in the articles, and the citation given here doesn't quite say the same thing.
