Template:Did you know nominations/Pulangi IV Hydroelectric Power Plant

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:38, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Pulangi IV Hydroelectric Power Plant

edit

Created/expanded by NortyNort (talk). Nominated by The Bushranger (talk) at 03:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Comment: Looking at this article, I measure the total prose to be 1492 characters (including footnote tags and such), which is below the 1500 character threshold. Also, I cannot find which reference supports the 23% claim.
  • That's very odd; DYK check showed well over. It seems to somehow be counting the infobox. However, I've now expanded the article to push it over 1500 for sure. The reference for the 23% is reference 4 ([1], page 6); I've placed a cite right after the fact, sorry for not catching that before. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:13, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Alright, for the criteria, the article:
Is new enough - created 3 days before nomination
Now >1500 characters of prose.
Article seems well-balanced and neutral, well referenced, doesn't seem plagiarized.
The hook:
Is of good length and formatting, cited, and interesting.
Now, I see that you have far more than 5 dyk?s in the past, so which dyk have you reviewed?
QPQ is only required for self nominations, which this is not. :) - The Bushranger One ping only 01:27, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
On second look, you are right, so I pass this nomination. (This is only my first review.)