Template:Did you know nominations/Public Prosecutor v. Taw Cheng Kong

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 01:31, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Public Prosecutor v. Taw Cheng Kong edit

(

)

... that as of 2009 the High Court of Singapore's judgment in the Taw Cheng Kong case was the only decision where a statutory provision had been struck down as unconstitutional?

Reviewed: Rip Jordan
Comment: Article was worked on in a sandbox (now deleted) and moved to the article namespace on 23 October 2011. The hook is referenced by footnote 80.

Created/expanded by Amanda.thng (talk), Devathas (talk), Gordon.li.2008 (talk), Jnraptor (talk), Ryan.su.2009 (talk), and Smuconlaw (talk). Nominated by Smuconlaw (talk) at 18:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

New enough, long enough, well cited, good (though kinda technical) prose, no apparent neutrality problems. Hook is long enough, interesting, and cited with an inline citation which I accept in good faith. I think this is good to go. Norstrem (talk) 23:20, 13 November 2011 (UTC)