Template:Did you know nominations/Prunus kansuensis

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Mifter (talk) 21:54, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Prunus kansuensis edit

Created by Abductive (talk). Self-nominated at 05:34, 28 October 2018 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough and long enough. Didn't do much source checking as I can't access most of them, but I note that the elevation range in the article is not consistent with the source. Hence also little copyright checking. I don't find the hook very interesting; I'd say something about how it is studied for breeding rather. Although "X that is not X" upon second thought may not be so bad. I see the QPQ is done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:19, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Yazbek put that elevation quote in quotemarks because it is wrong, she states the correct elevations a bit lower down. I have added the Flora of China ref to that line. There are many sources in the taxonbar that are readily available for inspection. Abductive (reasoning) 20:35, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
* Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:10, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
  • The QPQ is not a complete review. Yoninah (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
  • @Jo-Jo Eumerus: I can confirm that the QPQ has been completed satisfactorily. Yoninah (talk) 23:42, 3 December 2018 (UTC)