- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:16, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Prow house
edit- ... that a prow house is named after a ship's prow? Source: "so-called because the central projection has been likened to the prow of a ship" ([1])
Created by MB (talk). Self-nominated at 14:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC).
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
await QPQ, copyvio 2%, hook character count <100, article character count >3000, interesting hook - I didn't know that! Whispyhistory (talk) 16:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Whispyhistory, QPQ review now done. MB 03:39, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Yes No problems, ready for DYK Whispyhistory (talk) 09:29, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Returned from prep due to several paragraphs without any citations, per Rule D2. Yoninah (talk) 16:44, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment – I moved this entry from the DYK approved page back to the DYK nomination page as per the concerns presented in the discussion. North America1000 14:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- The section has been reworked.MB 15:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- Whispyhistory, QPQ review now done. MB 03:39, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
New reviewer needed to recheck the article to be sure it is adequately cited and that it reflects those sources, and that after the recent changes the hook remains in the article and cited there. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:49, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: The changes made were all in one small section (four sentences, not "several paragraphs" - it was really a bullet list of examples). I originally did not include citations since what these bullets were stating was obvious from the adjacent photos and really not necessary. There was never an "article-wide" citation issue and nothing wrong related to the hook. MB 16:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)