Template:Did you know nominations/Proton radius puzzle

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Proton radius puzzle edit

(

)

... that the proton radius puzzle is an unsolved problem in physics relating to a radius change in a proton from swapping in a muon for an electron?

Reviewed: Jude Flannery

Created by Silver seren (talk). Self-nominated at 22:18, 3 September 2016 (UTC).

No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 00:29, 03 September 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 2965 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (6.5% confidence; confirm)
  - Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 140 characters
- ✓ Silver seren has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Jude Flannery was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 00:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

The article and the hook meet DYK criteria, the article is well documented, the hook is interesting and referenced with reliable sources. Yarikata (talk) 17:46, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Yarikata, your review doesn't mention checking for close paraphrasing/copyvio or for neutrality, both important DYK criteria; can you please conduct those checks? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

In the cases of the articles that are available on-line there are no copyvio issues. For the others that would require purchase I assume good faith, considering the information included in the abstracts available online and that the parts referenced in the Wikipedia page are short and rendered explicitly as one sentence abstracts of the thesis developed in the respective articles. As for neutrality, the text draws information from a variety of reliable sources, and the information in these sources is to some extent interconnected to give an idea of the general consensus on this topic at this moment in the scientific world. The creator of this Wikipedia article followed the spirit of the sources, with no perceptible undue importance for specific aspects. Yarikata (talk) 12:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, Yarikata, for doing the checks. I have removed my "?" icon from my comment, so your approval tick again holds sway. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

I have removed this per discussion at WT:DYK. Gatoclass (talk) 13:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- The discussion is now complete, and this hook was proposed and supported Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 129#Proton radius puzzle (prep 5):
(ALT2) ... that different measurements of the size of the hydrogen atom nucleus when a muon replaces an electron is an unsolved problem in physics known as the proton radius puzzle?
- This hook fact is in the article. I think I see a reference too. The hook comes in at 171 characters, short enough. OK to proceed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)