Template:Did you know nominations/Proof of the Truthful

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:34, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Proof of the Truthful edit

Created by HaEr48 (talk). Self-nominated at 09:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC).

  • The article is long and new enough besides being free of Copy-vio. Also, it's well sourced and well organized. The hook is also interesting and there's a citation immediately after it in the article. However, there's an 'expand section' tag which would better be resolved before the promotion. --Mhhossein talk 05:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, Mhhossein. I'm planning to expand that section today or tomorrow. Is expanding that required before passing the DYK review? I mean, even without that section I think it is already long enough for a DYK. I added the tag more as a commitment to expand it later. In any case, I will update it soon. Thanks! HaEr48 (talk) 05:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
No, that's not a requirement. I meant to have it passed without a yellow tag on the article. Would you mind removing that, if you think enough materials is inserted? Mhhossein talk 05:53, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
@Mhhossein: Expanded the section and removed the tag. HaEr48 (talk) 07:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Good to go with this nomination. Mhhossein talk 13:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
@Mhhossein:: I slightly tweaked the hook for clarity. Let me know if it's not OK and I will revert it! HaEr48 (talk) 17:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
That's even better. --Mhhossein talk 17:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)