Template:Did you know nominations/Prepatellar bursitis
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 21:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Prepatellar bursitis edit
- ... that prepatellar bursitis (pictured) is also called "coal miner's knee"?
- Reviewed: St Athan
Created/expanded by Cryptic C62 (talk). Self nom at 18:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Started on June 29, 2006 so this is an expansion. Old version 1194 characters, new version 6064 characters = 5.1x. The reference for the hook checks out. Picture is fine. Does the second para need a reference? Secretlondon (talk) 19:23, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Are you referring to the second paragraph of the lead? The lead generally doesn't require citations because it summarizes material that is already presented in the body of the article. The only reason the first paragraph of the lead has citations is because the nicknames aren't mentioned anywhere else. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 19:53, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Okay. I can see that the material is covered again below. Secretlondon (talk) 20:09, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Note: the article is classified as a stub according to DYKcheck, which should have prevented it from being approved. Since it clearly isn't a stub, I've just bumped its classification up to Start class. It needs a more accurate evaluation, as it might be at a higher level than that. Since DYKcheck also said that the 5x date was January 19, I went back and checked that as well, but the extra characters then were of quickly reversed edits that shouldn't count. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:04, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your thoroughness! I actually intend to submit this to GAN soon; I think it has a reasonable shot at passing as is. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 21:20, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
