Template:Did you know nominations/Picture Rock Pass Petroglyphs Site

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kieran (talk) 00:58, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture Rock Pass Petroglyphs Site

edit

Created by Orygun (talk). Self nominated at 02:15, 23 November 2013 (UTC).

  • Just a comment. I'd suggest that you replace the current hook with something based on your "However, they were probably created during either Clovis Period (10,000 and 12,000 years ago) or the Stemmed Point Period that followed (7,500 to 10,000 years ago), placing the likely period of the rock carvings sometime between 7,500 and 12,000 years ago." sentence. The original hook is kind of long, but petroglyphs this old in the open air are surely extremely rare (the Indian God Rock petroglyphs are seemingly less than 1000 years old, but still badly eroded by natural processes) and thus a better subject for a hook. Nyttend (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Here's alternative hook per your suggestion. Hook source is same as above, Ref 5 pp. 2.28-2.29.--Orygun (talk) 18:42, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
ALT: ... that the Picture Rock Pass Petroglyphs located in northern Lake County, Oregon were likely created during the Clovis or Stemmed Point period sometime between 7,500 and 12,000 years ago?

Picture Rock Pass Petroglyphs

  • There is a suitable image at



  • Don’t know who suggested adding image, but image above is included in article and would go well with hook. Would need to add “...(petroglyph diagram pictured)...” since this is a diagram of the petroglyph’s layout; not an image of petroglyphs themselves.--Orygun (talk) 23:45, 25 November 2013 (UTC)


per above:

Slapdash hook writing: "located" and "sometime" are totally redundant, "likely" unidiomatic in British English, & "northern" much more precise than we need, thank you. Article looks fine, but another review needed. Johnbod (talk) 18:21, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

The following has been checked in this review by Maile
  • QPQ done by Orygun on exactly the date of the nomination
  • Article created by Ipoellet on October 17, 2013 as a redirect
  • Article became a non-redirect on November 23, 2013 by Orygun and has 5,692 characters of readable prose
  • Every paragraph sourced
  • Alt 3 Hook is 160 characters and sourced online at the end of the sentence, as stated above by the nominator
  • Earwig (Copyvio check) found no violations
  • Duplication Detector run on each online source, no issues found
  • Disambig links tool shows no issues
  • External links tool shows no problems, only indicating two links that require membership
  • Image is the nominator's creation and freely licensed on Commons