Template:Did you know nominations/Phillipe Cunningham
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Phillipe Cunningham
edit- ... that Phillipe Cunningham (pictured) is one of the first openly transgender people of color to be elected to public office in the United States?
- ALT1:... that Phillipe Cunningham (pictured) is one of the first two openly transgender men to be elected to a city council in the United States? [1]
- Reviewed: The Dead South
- Comment: reference [2] mentions Tyler Titus, elected to the school board in Erie, PA. Is it recommended that we start an article on Titus and include both in this DYK?
Created by Paul2520 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:04, 28 December 2017 (UTC).
- *My main concern is that council members are usually not sufficiently notable to pass GNG. However, weight of RS may override this.Zigzig20s (talk) 04:45, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Quid pro quo for Charles P. Fahey.Zigzig20s (talk) 04:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Zigzig20s. As for GNG, I would argue that, as per Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Politicians and judges, significant coverage has been demonstrated. This article demonstrates national coverage. = paul2520 (talk) 05:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- User:Cwmhiraeth: Since you reviewed my QPQ, do you think this passes GNG please? I think it should be good to go if it does.Zigzig20s (talk) 06:39, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- I would say that it does pass GNG and that you can give it the tick of approval. In any event, you have performed a thorough review which can count as your QPQ. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:50, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Good to go! Zigzig20s (talk) 07:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you, Zigzig20s. A photo was recently added to the article. As this DYK nom has been approved but is not lined up for inclusion on the Main Page, can we amend it to use the photo? Courtesy ping to Cwmhiraeth. = paul2520 (talk) 16:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- I have added the image and added the word (pictured) to the hook, so perhaps @Zigzig20s: can approve it with a new tick. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:26, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, Zigzig20s. A photo was recently added to the article. As this DYK nom has been approved but is not lined up for inclusion on the Main Page, can we amend it to use the photo? Courtesy ping to Cwmhiraeth. = paul2520 (talk) 16:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Good to go! Zigzig20s (talk) 07:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- I would say that it does pass GNG and that you can give it the tick of approval. In any event, you have performed a thorough review which can count as your QPQ. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:50, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- User:Cwmhiraeth: Since you reviewed my QPQ, do you think this passes GNG please? I think it should be good to go if it does.Zigzig20s (talk) 06:39, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Zigzig20s. As for GNG, I would argue that, as per Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Politicians and judges, significant coverage has been demonstrated. This article demonstrates national coverage. = paul2520 (talk) 05:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)