Template:Did you know nominations/Philip Humber's perfect game

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 15:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Philip Humber's perfect game, Philip Humber

edit

Philip Humber

  • Comment: Due to the recency of this event, can we get it an expedited review and get it on the main page quickly? Will add coauthor credits depending on work, I can review who did what.

Created/expanded by Muboshgu (talk). Self nom at 08:06, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

  • Pls make sure the article is no longer tagged with {{expand further}} when this DYK gets on MainPage. Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 00:22, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
    • I removed it. The article is sufficient for now, given that this just happened. It doesn't need to be a GA yes. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Can you guys give me a couple of days to beef up the bio. Then we can do a double.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:09, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Since I reviewed Philip Humber's perfect game much work has been put into the Philip Humber article and it has been added to make a double hook. It is an impressive article and is a 4.5 times expansion, good enough I consider. It is both new enough and long enough, is within policy and the image is appropriately licensed. I would go with the original hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:26, 24 April 2012 (UTC)