Template:Did you know nominations/Pheasant Coucal

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Pheasant Coucal edit

Pheasant Coucal, Queensland

  • ... that the eggs and young of the Pheasant Coucal (pictured) are predominantly cared for by the male parents?

Created/expanded by Casliber (talk). Self nom at 04:04, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

  • This article is almost ready. Hook is very interesting, of the correct length, and backed up by a reference. The article prose needs to be lengthened from 2,322 to 2,500 characters. In addition, there is a bare URL reference that will need to be correctly formatted.--TDogg310 (talk) 15:30, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
  • I get 3016 B (498 words) "readable prose size", and have formatted ref now. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 15:57, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
There is a red link for "The Atlas of Australian Birds (Blakers et al.)". Is this different to the Wiki article at "Atlas of Australian Birds"? Snowman (talk) 21:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
(a) no, and (b) fixed. Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:55, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Needs a reviewer to check the changes made in response to original review. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:55, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Article has been properly lengthened as stated above. All references are now full citations and all citation links work; no red links; two proper links to wiki articles; citation supports hook. So proper changes made and hook meets criteria. Should be ready to go. Donner60 (talk) 03:46, 26 July 2012 (UTC)