Template:Did you know nominations/Peter Wilmshurst
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 22:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Peter Wilmshurst edit
- ...
that Dr. Peter Wilmshurst was sued for libel by two separate companies due to publishing negative findings from clinical trials, a suppression of scientific discourse that was one of the catalysts for the UK's libel reform of 2013? - ... that libel writs against Dr. Peter Wilmshurst after he published negative findings from clinical trials, were a catalyst for the UK's libel reform of 2013?
Created by JzG (talk). Self-nominated at 07:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC).
interesting read - couple of things, JzG I presume that you've nominated less than 5 DYKs in your wikicareer? If not, you need to review someone else's. Also, a ref needs to appear at the end of the sentence mentioning libel (either the very first sentence or one in para 1 mentioning libel from company 1 as company 2 is reffed - DYK is specific about a ref at the end of the particular sentence. otherwise date and size ok and material is clearly faithful to sources. cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- You're right, I don't use DYK much (admin since 2006 and so few DYKs! What an under-achiever). However, I thought I'd give it a go, since it amazed me that we did not already have an article on this chap. Are you saying libel needs to be cited in the article? I brought the cite closer to the term, it was already sourced of course. Guy (Help!) 13:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
